Chaos in Delhi Court as Rice Thrown During Hearing
A dramatic scene unfolded in a Delhi courtroom when an accused man threw rice on the floor during proceedings, sparking panic and even suspicion of black magic among those present. The unusual incident occurred on August 11 in the courtroom of Additional Sessions Judge Shefali Barnala Tandon, where advocates and staff reported that the accused, identified as Dr. Chander Vibhas, had deliberately thrown rice during a hearing.
According to the court’s record, the sudden act forced proceedings to halt temporarily, as lawyers and staff refused to approach the dais for fear of sinister intent behind the act.
Judge Orders Accused to Clean Rice
Witnessing the disruption, Judge Tandon immediately directed the accused to collect the rice from the courtroom floor and also summoned a sweeper to ensure complete cleaning. For nearly 15–20 minutes, the court remained at a standstill until the floor was cleared.
In her remarks, the judge noted that such acts of disruption not only interrupt judicial functioning but also undermine the sanctity of the institution. She highlighted that the advocates present were hesitant to continue arguments until the spilt rice was cleaned, fearing it to be connected to occult practices or black magic.
Accused Kneels and Apologises
The accused, a surgeon by profession, apologised for his behaviour once confronted by the court. Initially, his counsel joined proceedings virtually and later sought time to appear physically. However, before further escalation, Dr. Vibhas fell to his knees inside the courtroom and expressed remorse for his conduct.
When the court reconvened later in the day, the judge reiterated that the courtroom is a sacred space where justice is delivered, and its dignity cannot be compromised under any circumstance.
Legal Grounds for Punishment
The court invoked Section 267 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which penalises intentional insult or interruption of a public servant during judicial proceedings. Judge Tandon emphasised that the provision exists to safeguard judicial officers from harassment or interference while ensuring uninterrupted court functioning.
Interestingly, the court also cited the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and Other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Act, stressing the importance of legal frameworks that protect society against irrational and harmful practices exploiting fear and ignorance.
Judge Criticises Educated Accused’s Behaviour
Expressing surprise at the accused’s actions, Judge Tandon pointed out the irony that a surgeon belonging to the educated and elite class indulged in such unreasonable behaviour inside a courtroom. She observed that the incident not only delayed the judicial process but also sent a damaging message to the public about respect for the justice system.
Her remarks underscored that disruptive behaviour in court threatens the very foundation of the legal system and must be dealt with firmly to maintain public trust.
Sentence and Fine Imposed
Taking into account the accused’s immediate apology, remorse, and assurance of not repeating the act, the court decided on a measured punishment. Dr. Vibhas was sentenced to imprisonment till the rising of the court—meaning his confinement lasted until the end of the day’s session—along with a fine of ₹2,000.
The judge clarified that the decision balanced accountability with compassion, ensuring that the punishment served as a deterrent while recognising the accused’s remorse.
Larger Social Implications
The incident has triggered wider discussions around superstition, black magic practices, and the need to protect the sanctity of courtrooms from irrational disruptions. Legal experts noted that such acts, whether driven by superstition or intent to intimidate, undermine confidence in the judicial process.
Judge Tandon’s firm response also highlighted the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the dignity of the court and ensuring that no individual—regardless of profession or status—can interfere with the smooth functioning of justice.
Conclusion
The rice-throwing episode in Delhi’s courtroom may appear bizarre, but it serves as a stark reminder of how superstition and disruptive behaviour can clash with the rational framework of law. By sentencing the accused surgeon to imprisonment till the rising of the court and imposing a fine, the judiciary reaffirmed its role in defending order, dignity, and public trust in the legal system.
